Iranian Stone Chocolate: The Craft, the Chemistry and an Honest Look at the Story

Imported novelty foods tend to arrive wrapped in words like ancient, legendary and traditional. When we looked into whether any of that is true for the Stone Chocolate we sell, we found that the honest story is more interesting than an invented one, and also that it is easy to say more about chocolate than anyone can prove. This guide covers what we actually know about this product, how chocolate is made from bean to bar, what a stone grinder does, how genuine stone-ground chocolate traditions such as Sicily's Modica chocolate work, whether Iranian stone chocolate is a traditional Persian sweet, and what the research says about the two health questions people ask most: does dark chocolate help the heart, and does it contain lead and cadmium?

We have also corrected earlier statements on this page. An earlier version described the technique behind this product as stone grinding. We cannot confirm that for this product, and we explain below what we can and cannot say.

What we actually know about this product

Our Stone Chocolate product page says that it is imported chocolate sourced from Iran, with a naturally speckled, stone-like shell, sold as a 200 g box and intended for snacking or gifting. It advises storing the box in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight and resealing it tightly after opening. That is the whole of what we have documented. The page does not list a cocoa percentage, a full ingredient list or an allergen statement, and we have no independent laboratory analysis of it. For any chocolate, the ingredient panel on the pack is the authoritative place to read the list of ingredients and allergens, including milk, nuts, soy and gluten, and if you have an allergy you should check the pack rather than rely on a web page.

The word "stone" could mean two different things, and it matters which. It could refer to stone grinding, the use of granite wheels to refine the chocolate, or to the stone-like appearance of a speckled shell. Our page describes the shell. It does not say the chocolate itself was ground on stone. We mention this because a generic explanation of stone grinding, which an earlier version of this page gave, can leave a reader with the impression that the chocolate in the box was made that way. We have no evidence about the production method for this batch, so we describe the technique below as a general topic and not as a fact about this product.

How chocolate is made, from bean to bar

Every chocolate, however it looks, starts with cocoa beans, which are the seeds of the cacao tree. The beans are fermented and dried near where they are grown, then shipped to a chocolate maker who turns them into chocolate through a sequence of steps. Understanding the sequence makes it clear where a stone grinder fits and what a phrase like "stone-ground" can and cannot mean.

Roasting develops the chocolate flavour. It does so through chemical reactions among flavour precursors in the bean, such as proteins, amino acids and reducing sugars. The roasted beans are then cracked open and winnowed, which separates the nibs, the edible centres, from the husks. The nibs are ground into a thick paste called cocoa mass, also known as chocolate liquor, which contains both the cocoa solids and the cocoa butter. Refining reduces the particles further, and conching kneads, warms and aerates the chocolate to develop flavour, reduce acidity and drive off unwanted volatile flavours, a step that can last from a few hours to several days depending on the quality and style sought. Tempering then heats, cools and slightly reheats the chocolate so the cocoa butter crystallises in the right form, which gives a glossy finish and a clean snap. Finally the chocolate is poured into moulds, and in a filled or shell chocolate the mould is coated first and then filled.

What a melanger does

A melanger, from the French word for a blender, is a stone grinder used in chocolate making. It typically consists of two granite wheels that rotate inside a metal drum on top of a granite base. Left running for long enough, the wheels can reduce the particles to sizes measured in microns, turning roasted nibs into a smooth chocolate paste. A melanger can serve as both a refiner and a conche, so a small maker can take cocoa nibs and sugar and finish the chocolate in a single machine. The design is old: in 1819 François Pelletier used a steam-powered melanger that let him make 76 kilograms of chocolate in twelve hours, work that had taken seven people at the time. Today melangers tend to be used mainly by small manufacturers, since large producers rely on higher-capacity industrial machinery.

Notice what a melanger is not. It is a method, not a quality grade, and it does not tell you how good the beans were, how the chocolate was roasted, how much sugar was added or whether the chocolate is safe. "Stone-ground" on a wrapper is a description of one processing step, and a chocolate can be stone-ground and unremarkable or made on steel rollers and excellent. It also says nothing about health, and none of the research we discuss later compares stone-ground with conventionally ground chocolate.

Genuine stone-ground traditions: from the metate to Modica

Stone grinding of cocoa has a long history. In Mesoamerica cocoa beans were processed by hand on a metate, a grinding stone, and the Spanish probably learned the technique there before carrying it to their territories in Europe. In Sicily the method survived in the town of Modica, where chocolate is still made by a cold process. Modica chocolate obtained protected geographical indication status from the European Union in October 2018. Its production rules illustrate what a real stone-ground tradition looks like, and how different that is from a product name.

Modica chocolate must be worked cold, at temperatures that do not exceed 40 to 45 degrees Celsius, and without conching. Because of that low temperature the added sugar does not dissolve, so it remains as crystals that give the chocolate its signature grainy, crunchy texture. The permitted cocoa content ranges from 45 to 90 percent. Only ground cocoa, with its cocoa butter intact, and sugar are essential ingredients. Optional flavourings include cinnamon, vanilla, ginger, chilli, nuts and citrus peel, and the chocolate contains no milk, no butter, no vegetable fat and no lecithin.

The comparison makes a point that is easy to miss. "Stone chocolate" is not a protected name, and it has no legal definition we could find. A protected product like Modica chocolate has enforceable rules about temperature, ingredients and cocoa content. A product sold as "stone chocolate" has whatever the maker chooses to put behind the name. That is not a criticism of imported chocolate. It is a reason to read the ingredient panel and ask the seller for what the pack does not say.

The speckled shell

The feature our page emphasises is the shell: a speckled, stone-like surface. Confectioners create speckled and marbled finishes in several standard ways. They colour cocoa butter and apply it to the inside of a mould before casting the shell, either by flicking or splattering it, for instance with a toothbrush, by brushing, by marbling two or more colours together, or by spraying it through an airbrush. Cocoa butter is used because it sets into the chocolate and is edible, and it needs to be kept warm enough to spread, typically in the low thirties degrees Celsius, but not so warm that it melts the shell. These are ordinary chocolatier methods described by professional chocolate schools and craft chocolatiers.

We do not know which method, if any, produced the surface on this product. The page describes the speckles as natural, and we have no production details to add. So we treat the shell as what it plainly is, a distinctive appearance that makes the box a good gift, and not as evidence of any particular technique.

Is it a traditional Persian sweet?

Honestly, we found no sign that it is. Iran has a rich, well-documented confectionery tradition, and it is worth describing accurately because it is often invoked in marketing. Nowruz, the Persian New Year, is celebrated with sweets called shirini, which represent the longing for sweetness in the year to come and are enjoyed generously with spiced black tea over the 13-day holiday. Home baking examples include nan-e gerdui, a walnut cookie scented with cardamom, zoolbia, a crisp, lacy fritter soaked in saffron and rosewater syrup, tar halva, a pudding of rice flour, saffron, rosewater and sugar, and nan-e keshmeshi, a raisin cookie.

Two regional confections are famous well beyond Iran. Sohan is a saffron brittle toffee from the city of Qom, made from wheat flour, sugar, saffron, cardamom and rosewater and often sprinkled with almonds or pistachios, and it originated in the Qajar period according to standard accounts. Gaz is a chewy white nougat from Isfahan made from egg whites, sugar, pistachios or almonds and rosewater, traditionally with honeydew collected from a plant known as Persian manna, and Kerman's version uses saffron and almonds. Accounts differ on whether gaz dates from the Safavid or Qajar era. Both are tied to specific places and to festivals, and both have long lineages.

"Stone chocolate" does not appear in any of the sources on Persian sweets that we reviewed. That does not prove nobody in Iran has ever used the term, and we cannot see into every family kitchen. It does mean that describing this chocolate as an ancient Persian recipe would be unsupported. What it looks like is a contemporary confectionery product from a country with a real confectionery culture and a real chocolate industry. One Iranian producer, Parmida, lists an 84 percent cocoa dark chocolate bar on its website, which shows that high-percentage dark chocolate is made in Iran. It says nothing about the cocoa content of the chocolate in our box, and we will not borrow another maker's figures for it.

What the research says: chocolate and the heart

Dark chocolate has a health halo, built mostly on cocoa flavanols, a group of plant compounds abundant in cocoa. The evidence needs to be read in two parts, and the distinction between chocolate and cocoa extract is the important one.

In the European Union, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) accepted a health claim that cocoa flavanols help maintain endothelium-dependent vasodilation, meaning the ability of blood vessels to widen, which contributes to normal blood flow. The condition attached to it is specific: 200 mg of cocoa flavanols a day, which EFSA said could be provided by 2.5 g of high-flavanol cocoa powder or 10 g of high-flavanol dark chocolate. The words "high-flavanol" matter, since flavanol content varies widely between cocoa products and is affected by processing, and an ordinary chocolate bar does not necessarily meet that standard. Nothing on a typical wrapper tells you how many flavanols it contains.

The largest test of cocoa flavanols against actual disease is the COSMOS trial, published in 2022 in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition by a team from Harvard-affiliated hospitals and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. It randomised 21,442 US adults, women aged 65 or older and men aged 60 or older, to take either a cocoa extract supplement providing 500 mg of flavanols a day, including 80 mg of epicatechin, or a placebo, and followed them for a median of 3.6 years. The cocoa extract did not significantly reduce the primary outcome, total cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.02, p = 0.11): there were 410 events in the cocoa group against 456 with placebo. It did reduce cardiovascular deaths, with a hazard ratio of 0.73 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.98), which the authors described as a 27 percent reduction. An analysis that only counted follow-up while participants were taking their capsules suggested a lower risk of total cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.99). No safety concerns arose. The authors concluded that additional research is warranted.

A separate line of evidence looks at blood pressure. A Cochrane systematic review updated in 2017 by Ried, Fakler and Stocks pooled 35 randomised trials, with 40 treatment comparisons and 1,804 mostly healthy participants, in which flavanol-rich chocolate or cocoa was compared with low-flavanol or flavanol-free products for at least two weeks. The cocoa groups received between 30 and 1,218 mg of flavanols a day, averaging 670 mg, from 1.4 to 105 g of cocoa products. Over an average of nine weeks, systolic blood pressure was lower by 1.76 mmHg (95% CI 0.43 to 3.09 lower) and diastolic pressure by 1.76 mmHg (95% CI 0.94 to 2.57 lower) than with control.

The effect was larger in people with hypertension, whose systolic pressure fell by about 4 mmHg, and not significant in people with normal blood pressure, although the test for that difference was of borderline significance. The reviewers rated the evidence as moderate quality and described the finding as a small, roughly 2 mmHg, blood pressure-lowering effect in mainly healthy adults in the short term. They also noted that excluding trials with authors employed by sponsoring industry slightly reduced the effect, which points to some reporting bias, and that cocoa products were well tolerated, with gastrointestinal complaints and nausea reported by 1 percent of participants in the cocoa groups and 0.4 percent in controls. Importantly, the review concerns flavanol-rich products, so it does not describe chocolate in general.

What should a reader take from this? First, the trial tested a supplement designed to deliver a standardised flavanol dose, not chocolate. Second, its main result was not statistically significant, while the reduction in cardiovascular deaths was, and one significant result among several secondary outcomes can arise by chance, which is why the authors called for more research. Third, none of it tells you that eating a chocolate bar, with its sugar, fat and unknown flavanol content, produces the same effect. Chocolate can be part of a balanced diet, and the honest heart-health case for it is much weaker than the popular image.

Not all cocoa products carry the same flavanols

The flavanol dose that studies test cannot be assumed for any given bar, because flavanol content varies enormously with the type of cocoa and how it is processed. A 2008 study in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry measured total flavanols in commercial cocoa powders, comparing natural cocoas with powders that had been alkalized, the treatment often called Dutch processing that darkens cocoa and softens its flavour. Natural cocoas averaged 34.6 mg of flavanols per gram, lightly processed cocoas 13.8 mg per gram, medium-processed cocoas 7.8 mg per gram and heavily processed cocoas 3.9 mg per gram. Heavy alkalization therefore left roughly one ninth of the flavanols found in natural cocoa.

A companion survey of chocolate and cocoa products sold in the United States, published in 2009 by the same research programme, ranked product types by flavanol content: cocoa powders came out highest, followed by unsweetened baking chocolate, then dark chocolate and semisweet chips, then milk chocolate, with chocolate syrup last. The message is not that any one product is good or bad. It is that a phrase such as "dark", a cocoa percentage or a speckled shell says little about flavanols, and that wrappers rarely declare them. The figures come from US products tested more than a decade ago and illustrate a range, not the content of anything we sell.

Lead and cadmium in dark chocolate

The second question is about safety. In December 2022 Consumer Reports published results of tests on 28 dark chocolate bars. It found measurable lead, cadmium or both in every bar. It compared the amounts with California's maximum allowable dose levels, precautionary limits set at 0.5 micrograms a day for lead and 4.1 micrograms a day for cadmium, using a serving of one ounce, about 28 grams. Under that measure, 23 of the 28 bars would put an adult over the limit for at least one of the metals if eaten at one ounce a day: 10 bars for lead only, 8 for cadmium only and 5 for both. Only 5 of the 28 were within the limits for both metals.

Three points of context are needed. First, these are precautionary limits designed to protect consumers over years of exposure, and being above them does not mean acute poisoning. Second, the finding is about the 28 bars tested, mostly popular US brands, and it says nothing about any specific product we sell. Third, and most relevant here, a Harvard Health summary explains that cocoa can pick up cadmium and lead from polluted soil, not only as the crop grows but also during harvesting and processing. That means contamination is a supply-chain issue that depends on where the beans were grown and how they were handled, not on whether the chocolate is stone-ground or speckled. The practical advice from that summary is to choose brands that were found to be safer where information exists, or to enjoy dark chocolate occasionally rather than daily. We have no laboratory data on the metal content of the chocolate in our box. If that matters to you, ask any seller, including us, whether test results exist, and treat a lack of an answer as information.

How regulators treat cadmium

Regulators have responded to the cadmium problem in particular. European Union Regulation 488/2014 sets maximum cadmium levels for chocolate and cocoa products that apply from 1 January 2019. The limits are tiered by cocoa content, because cadmium levels in cocoa products are related to their cocoa content: a chocolate with more cocoa solids is allowed a higher limit than one with less. Table 4 lists them. They are expressed per kilogram of product and cover cadmium only, not lead. All else being equal, they mean that chocolate with more cocoa solids tends to carry more cadmium, and that the law in the EU treats the issue as real enough to regulate.

These figures give a practical question to put to a seller of any chocolate: do you have test results for cadmium and lead, and how do they compare with a recognised limit? A seller who can answer is showing the transparency that the label alone cannot.

Reading the nutrition panel: sugar, fat and serving size

Whatever its origin, chocolate is an energy-dense treat: it combines fat from cocoa butter, and often milk fat, with added sugar. Our product page does not publish a nutrition panel, so the pack is again the place to look. Three lines are worth reading. Serving size tells you what portion the numbers describe. Sugars per 100 g tells you how sweet the chocolate is. Total fat and saturated fat tell you how rich it is. Higher cocoa percentages tend to mean less sugar and more cocoa solids, but the percentage does not guarantee a low sugar figure, and you cannot infer sugar from a name like "dark" or "stone".

To keep a box in perspective, remember that our 200 g box holds roughly seven one-ounce servings, since an ounce is about 28 g. The sugar you eat depends on how big your piece is. Table 3 turns a range of hypothetical sugar values into grams of sugar per portion, so that whatever your pack says, you can check it against the sugar limits. It is arithmetic, not data about our chocolate: sugar per portion equals sugar per 100 g multiplied by the portion weight and divided by 100.

The comparison to make is with your whole day's sugar, not just the chocolate. Our honey dosage guide sets out the sugar limits from the WHO, the American Heart Association and the 2025-2030 US Dietary Guidelines, and the same logic applies here: chocolate is added sugar, and it shares a daily budget with tea sweeteners, desserts and everything else. A small piece after a meal is easy to fit inside every one of those limits. A whole box in an evening is not.

Caffeine, theobromine and other sensitivities

Cocoa naturally contains caffeine and a related stimulant, theobromine, and generally the more cocoa solids a chocolate contains, the more of them it carries. In a small piece the amounts are modest, but people who are sensitive to caffeine, children, and anyone whose sleep is easily disturbed may want to eat chocolate earlier in the day. If you are pregnant or breastfeeding, follow your doctor's advice on caffeine from all sources. Keep chocolate well away from dogs and other pets, as veterinary authorities warn that it is toxic to them.

Allergens and dietary needs

Chocolate products commonly contain or may be cross-contaminated with milk, soy lecithin, nuts and gluten-containing ingredients, and a filled chocolate adds whatever is in the filling. Because our product page does not carry an ingredient or allergen statement, we cannot tell you whether any particular allergen is present, and we would not want you to rely on a web page for a safety decision. Read the pack. The same goes for vegan, halal or other dietary requirements: rely on the certification and the ingredient panel on the pack, and if either is missing or unclear, do not assume.

Storing and serving

Our page's storage advice is the standard for chocolate: keep it in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight, and reseal the container tightly after opening. Heat softens chocolate and lets the cocoa butter separate, and moisture can dissolve surface sugar. Confectioners call the resulting white or grey haze on the surface bloom. It looks unappealing and can leave a slightly gritty or crumbly texture, but it is a matter of appearance and texture rather than a sign that the chocolate is unsafe. Bloom is best avoided by avoiding temperature swings, not by keeping the chocolate somewhere cold and damp.

For serving, break the chocolate into pieces and let it sit at room temperature for a few minutes if it has been stored cool, since the flavour is easier to appreciate when it is not cold. A speckled shell makes a box like this a natural gift, and it pairs well with an unsweetened drink. If you are choosing a drink, our wild herbal tea guide explains the caffeine-free options and a caution about iron that applies to tea with meals.

How to choose a chocolate

Putting the evidence together yields a short, practical checklist that works for any chocolate, including ours.

• Read the ingredient list. Shorter lists that name cocoa ingredients first tell you more than a name or a legend. Check whether fats other than cocoa butter, milk products, nuts or soy are present.
• Read the sugar line, not just the cocoa percentage. The percentage describes cocoa content. The sugars per 100 g and the serving size tell you what it does to your sugar budget.
• Do not treat "dark" as a health claim. Flavanols vary widely with cocoa type and processing, and the heart-health evidence is for flavanol-rich extracts and products, not for chocolate in general.
• Ask about origin and testing. Where the beans were grown and how they were handled affect contamination. A seller with test results for cadmium and lead, set against a limit such as the EU's, is more trustworthy than one with a story.
• Keep the portion modest. A piece or two after a meal fits every sugar guideline more comfortably than a whole box in an evening.
• Check the pack for allergens and dietary suitability. A product page cannot replace the ingredient panel.

Why we tell the story this way

Most of the products on this site have a traceable connection to Hunza Valley sourcing. Stone Chocolate does not, and forcing a heritage story onto it would be dishonest. What it is, on the evidence we have, is a chocolate from a country with a genuine confectionery culture and a genuine chocolate industry, with a distinctive shell that makes it a memorable gift. That is worth telling plainly. We would rather a customer buy it knowing exactly what it is than buy it because of a claim that could not survive a search.

The same standard applies to the health claims around chocolate. The best evidence for heart benefits is for a standardised extract, and it produced mixed results. The best evidence on contaminants shows a supply-chain problem that affects many brands. Neither supports advertising a chocolate box as a health food, and we do not.

Frequently asked questions

Is stone chocolate healthier than ordinary chocolate? We found no research showing that stone-ground chocolate is healthier than chocolate made by other methods, and our product page does not say the chocolate is stone-ground. Nutrition depends on cocoa content, sugar and fat, not on the machine.

Is Iranian stone chocolate a traditional Persian sweet? We found no sign of that. Persian sweets such as sohan from Qom and gaz from Isfahan are documented, place-specific confections. Stone chocolate looks like a contemporary product from a country with a real chocolate industry.

What is the cocoa percentage? Our product page does not state one, and we do not have a verified figure, so we do not give one. The pack may show it. The cocoa percentage is worth checking, but it does not on its own tell you the sugar content.

Does dark chocolate protect the heart? The strongest evidence is for a cocoa flavanol extract, not for bars. In the COSMOS trial of 21,442 older adults, the extract did not significantly reduce total cardiovascular events but was associated with fewer cardiovascular deaths. The trial does not show that eating chocolate produces the same effect.

Does dark chocolate contain lead and cadmium? Consumer Reports found measurable amounts in all 28 bars it tested, and 23 exceeded California's limits at one ounce a day. Contamination can occur in the soil and during harvesting and processing. We have no laboratory data for our chocolate, so keep portions modest and ask sellers about testing.

How much can I eat? There is no official chocolate limit. A small piece, roughly 10 to 20 g, after a meal is a sensible portion, and the sugar on the pack tells you how it fits your daily budget.

How should I store it? Cool, dry and out of sunlight, in a resealed container, as our product page advises. Bloom is a cosmetic change and not a safety problem.

Can my dog have a piece? No. Chocolate is toxic to dogs, so keep it out of their reach.

Is it suitable for someone with a nut, milk or soy allergy? We cannot tell from the page. Read the ingredient and allergen statements on the pack, and if in doubt do not eat it.

The bottom line

Our Stone Chocolate is an imported chocolate from Iran with a speckled, stone-like shell, and that is the full extent of what we can honestly claim about it. Stone grinding is a real, small-batch method with a long history, and protected traditions like Modica chocolate show what genuine stone-ground rules look like, but neither the name nor the shell tells you how this chocolate was made. It is not a traditional Persian sweet as far as we can tell. The health story around dark chocolate is weaker than the marketing suggests, and the contamination question applies to the whole category. Enjoy it as a treat, read the pack for ingredients, allergens and sugar, keep to sensible portions, and be sceptical of any seller that offers a legend instead of a label.

How we researched this article

Chocolate-making steps come from manufacturing descriptions by industry and craft sources. The melanger and Modica chocolate facts come from their reference entries, and the Persian sweets from a Nowruz cooking article and reference entries. Clinical evidence comes from the COSMOS trial indexed in PubMed, the EFSA health claim, and Consumer Reports and Harvard Health for contaminants. Product facts come from our own product page as of 21 September 2026. Where an earlier version of this page could not be supported, it was corrected. This article is general information, not medical advice.

References

1. Melanger. Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melanger
2. Cioccolato di Modica. Wikipedia, citing Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1529. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cioccolato_di_Modica
3. Callebaut. Getting creative with hollow figures: lively colour patterns (chocolate mould decoration technique). callebaut.com
4. King Arthur Baking. Persian desserts for Nowruz. kingarthurbaking.com
5. Sohan (confectionery). Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org
6. Gaz (candy). Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org
7. Parmida Chocolate. 84% cocoa dark chocolate bar, 80 g. parmidachocolate.com
8. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies. Scientific opinion on the modification of the authorisation of a health claim related to cocoa flavanols and maintenance of normal endothelium-dependent vasodilation. EFSA Journal 2014;12(5):3654. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3654
9. Sesso HD, Manson JE, Aragaki AK, et al. Effect of cocoa flavanol supplementation for the prevention of cardiovascular disease events: the COSMOS randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2022;115(6):1490-1500. doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqac055
10. Consumer Reports. Lead and cadmium could be in your dark chocolate (15 December 2022). consumerreports.org
11. Harvard Health Publishing. Heavy metals found in popular brands of dark chocolate. health.harvard.edu
12. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, The Nutrition Source. Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2025-2030. nutritionsource.hsph.harvard.edu
13. Ried K, Fakler P, Stocks NP. Effect of cocoa on blood pressure. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017;4:CD008893. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008893.pub3
14. Miller KB, et al. Impact of alkalization on the antioxidant and flavanol content of commercial cocoa powders. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2008. doi:10.1021/jf801670p
15. Miller KB, et al. Survey of commercially available chocolate- and cocoa-containing products in the United States. 2. Comparison of flavan-3-ol content with nonfat cocoa solids, total polyphenols, and percent cacao. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2009. PubMed 19754118
16. Commission Regulation (EU) No 488/2014 of 12 May 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as regards maximum levels of cadmium in foodstuffs. legislation.gov.uk